In fact, you cannot vote until the texts appear.
But if any moderator decides at that point to approve a text which was not yet approved, then this text will pop up...
It makes some problems, but this point is useful.
Because a text does not appear if it has not been approved by a moderator. So, if all moderators forgot to validate a text, it's very urging to be able to approve a text, even if the votes have started...
Improving Championship 2019
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 27 Aug 2018 11:26
- Location: Spain
Only 7 days left to 2019. I'd like to remember this:
SlowMotion wrote:You don't have to take any decision now! I mean, I think we are working in 2019 championship, in 3 months we'll have more ideas, you can read it and think about all with calm and choose the best option. In fact, I'm going to propose another table with the championship, haha.jeandid wrote:Well, why not!
It seems to be a smart idea. I have to study this proposition.
Indeed, the 2 & 3 days are close. We could merge them into 3 days.
But...
What would be the ¿?
This point is very important, since if I don't know it, I cannot take any decision.
Why don't connect all times in one? For example 4 days, cause is the average more or less (or 5 days if you think is better). About the ¿? I was thinking about numbers, but numbers is not a kind of type that deserves more than 1 master / year. So... I was thinking about a difficult code text with symbols ([]{}?¿"!ª) for example. If not... well, another option could be (the insert image) to replace the three "¿?" by 1-numbers, 2-other.
Some clarifications:
-"Other" should be one different language every time.
-Moderators should check the proposition texts in order to preserve the seriousness and formality. So, no stupid texts without sense, no texts already played in the past, etc.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 07 Jan 2019 14:00
- Location: Tacloban City